Short rant about social work

Do social work programs have a class on how to treat each person who walks through the door as though they are doing you a huge favour that you somehow are not deserving of? I didn't see it in the curriculum, but maybe I missed that day.

I came to expect it while at the welfare office unfortunately, but was not expecting that same attitude while trying to find out how to get my son tested for autism. The fact that I cannot come up with $2000 for private testing does not make me a bad parent. Nor does it make my son any less deserving of help than his middle-class peers.

I do know some amazing and caring social workers, so I am not meaning to insult anyone in the profession. The institutional processes that are in place within many of these programs create an atmosphere that makes the power dynamic between the social worker and the client readily visible to those of us who are attempting to access services.

Facebook comment....

New favorite ignorant facebook comment on my wall...

What does your profession contribute to society? That's rhetorical, the answer is nothing.

So, what is my profession exactly? TEACHING, which obviously contributes nothing. Neither does sociology, which is the discipline I wish to teach.

No, sociology just "tell[s] people what they can and cannot accept"

To which I responded;

I cannot accept homophobia, heterosexism, racism, sexism, or anti-poverty discrimination. I cannot tolerate policies that will hurt women, indiginous people, or other marginalized groups. I cannot accept policies that take from families to give tax breaks to giant corporations. And I cannot accept 39% of the vote allowing one person full control over parliament. Most people voted AGAINST Harper... not for him. That should not be a majority... this is not a democracy, which is another thing that I cannot accept.

Post-election thoughts...

WTF Canada? I have a lot of trouble understanding how some people think more generally, and this election result I just don't get at all! I can't wrap my head around the idea that anyone would vote for Harper, nevermind that he would be handed a majority government.

Seriously, the election was held because he was found to be in contempt of parliament, and this is the first time that has happened in ANY commonwealth country. They were hiding information about how much their policies would cost... and not just small bits of information but upwards of 630 million dollars worth of information on the crime bills. They underestimated the cost of the fighter jets... yes, the ones that are expected to cost each Canadian citizen (I hate that word) $1000. They even misinformed parliament to get the money for the G8/G20 in a process that has been found to be illegal.

And yet, we voted him back in...

This man, who has gone on record saying that our health care needs to end, who opposes gay marriage and abortion rights, who has cut funding for women by 43%, who has been found having lied to us on too many occasions to count, who shuts down parliament to run away from his problems, who fires people who disagree with him and kicks students out of his rallies because he doesn't like their facebook pages, who eliminated the long form census because he doesn't want us to know what is actually going on in our country if the knowledge won't serve his agenda... I could go on... This man is running the country! And we are letting him do just that.

So, if you are a "normal" person and break the law, you get put into one of his super prisons that we are wasting so much money on, even though crime rates are going down, but if you are powerful and break the law, you are given a country to run.

This might be me speaking out of anger and frustration, but I am seriously thinking that not voting is the way to go (see the "vote with your feet" section here). And I don't mean apathy, I mean refusing to accept an illegitimate system... how does 40% of the vote get almost 60% of the seats and full decision-making power? I also like the idea of refusing to choose my master... we should find a way to govern ourselves... not to let some privileged straight white man do that for us.

Naomi Klein had a great tweet last night- "Hair-raising shock doctrine coming our way folks. Better to have NDP in opposition than Libs but real power will be in the streets."

Edited to add:

I had an interesting conversation with my 8-year old today that got me thinking. We were talking about the election and the concept of a budget came up. I used our household budget as an example of what a budget is and then talked about the fighter jets as an example of Harper's lies about how much it was going to cost. She was quite upset about the fighter jets and said something along the lines of;

Why do we need stuff to go to war? Why can't we all just like each other and share our money and food with them?

Which got me thinking, why do we need to socialize children out of this way of thinking? Why do we dismiss it as "naive" or merely a reflection of "childhood innocence" (yet another term that I really don't like)? It seems to me that if children often think like this and need to be taught that they should instead value goals associated with rugged individualism, then something resembling a true democratic and socialist way of organizing might be even more attainable than I had imagined.

Inclusiveness sign at an elementary school

I was at a fun fair at my kids' school, and I saw this on the wall in a classroom.

In case it is hard to read, the caption at the bottom reads "Includes Everybody"

Upon further investigation, I realized that it was in every classroom, usually posted in an obvious place, like right next to the main doorway. In at least one classroom it was hidden near a corner at the top of a chalkboard, but that did not seem to be the norm.

The cell phone picture is so blurry that I can't make out a few of the symbols and don't remember what they were, but notice the one on the top left, which represents Pride. This never would have been allowed when I was in grade school. I like how this goes against the notion that children must be protected from knowledge that non-heterosexuality exists... what I would like even more is if all relationships were just seen as normal this type of sign wasn't necessary, but I'll take what I can get.

I'm not sure how well the school itself follows these ideas, or how well they actually teach inclusiveness, but I am told that the new VP is very concerned about such things, which I find fantastic.

My visit to Karl Marx's Gravesite

Ok, so I really have not been posting much, but that will hopefully change now that the school year is over... this summer I am only bargaining for a collective agreement, working a summer job, doing an independent study course, and conducting interviews for my thesis (trust me, that means things are slowing down!!!). Oh, and there are two major conferences and I still have two children in there too somewhere.... Anyway, this is a post that I started in March, and I'm finally getting around to posting now!

In February, I went to a conference as an executive for my GTA union. One of the events was a Raise the Rates rally with John Clarke (an activist from Toronto who helped found the Ontario Coalition Against Poverty) and I was on the speakers panel. That's right... I met, and spoke with John Clarke! I felt like a 12 year old girl meeting Justin Beiber. I mean, I use John Clarke's theorizing and political activism as part of the conclusion to my thesis, for how we can change social policy for the better! I love how he combines theorizing with doing. I wanted to post a variation of the last part of my speech, because I find it quite relevant right now (possibly slightly moreso when that part was written, 2 months ago, than right now, but I will post it anyway!!!).

Part of the reason for not posting much over the past few months is that I took a trip to the UK... before this, the furthest I can remember traveling is Ottawa (about 6 hours away), so this was quite the experience for me. When we were in London, we took the tube to Highgate cemetery and visited Karl Marx's gravesite.

I sat on a bench in that quiet old cemetery on a typically cool and damp London winter day, and looked up at this giant granite head while trying to plan what I was going to say (I was quite nervous... did I mention that John Clarke would be there???).

I was inspired by the two quotes on his tombstone.

Workers of all lands unite!

And what my philosophy professor refers to as the Password to Marx's work

Philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways, the point is to change it

What struck me at that moment was the global political climate. I was aware of what has been happening in Egypt and Lybia before leaving Canada, but it only takes up a few seconds of a 90 second news update. In the UK, international news stories are discussed at length in the news... which was a refreshing surprise to me. But it meant that I had been submersed in dialogue about the political action taking place globally when I went for coffee or ate breakfast at the hotel restaurant.

That week in Egypt, political organizing caused the president of 30 years to step down! In Lybia, that very morning, two fighter jets had taken refuge in Malta, refusing to obey orders to bomb protesters. That morning was also the first I had heard about organizing in Wisconsin, they announced that 40,000 protesters, mostly students and unionized workers, had taken over parliament. That one shocked me most... this was happening so close to home! My favorite moment at the conference was when one of my colleagues from Carleton University stood up in the middle of a debate of some sort, went to the mic, and told us that the police had joined the protesters. This news was met with applause and cheers from the crowd.

Back on my campus, a group of students formed an activist group to protest cuts to French programs called MERDE (which, literally translated, means shit), and I believe stands for Movement Etudiant Revendique nos Droits d'Education (student movement demanding our educational rights). A few weeks before this, they taped up the elevators, forcing university administrators and the board of governers to walk up 11 flights of stairs to get to their meeting in protest of widespread cuts (along with increased bonuses for admin and higher tuition rates for everyone).

I think I am always going to remember looking up at that gravesite and contemplating world politics. I don't remember ever seeing this type of widespread political unrest (granted, I am quite young). But thinking about it at that location, I got goosebumps. The juxtaposition of the quite, serene, ivy covered tombstones with along with my desire to hop on a plane and go to Wisconsin, where I'm sure the atmosphere was much less serene, reactivated my ability to foresee changes occuring. Maybe people are not as apathetic as I believed previously. Maybe this is possible, and my work, along with the work of other activists (have I mentioned John Clarke?!?!?) will have some serious results in the very near future.

Workers across the lands need to unite to change the world, and we need to do it NOW. We have to reinstate benefit levels to pre-Harris rates (for those of you not from Ontario, in the last 15 years, welfare recipients have seen about a 55% decrease in their pay). We need to restore special dietary allowances which are currently being taken away from a lot of people, and are the only thing that is keeping a lot of people housed and fed. We need to fight to improve education; education is a right and should be free, students should not have to take out loans to pay for their everyday costs of living, including feeding their children, while in school. I can list dozens of progressive causes that activists are fighting for, all of which I believe should be uniting to change things.

Not only do we have these movements globally to look at to foster solidarity, but we have an election coming up in Canada... and it appears as though young people might actually be voting! Recent polls (which I don't entirely trust) show that our most left-wing mainstream political party, the NDP, has the highest level of support that they have ever had... not enough to win, but enough to make a formidable opposition. Although my personal belief is that change should happen separate from the government in order to have any real lasting effect, I am still making sure to vote on Monday, and I ask that anyone who is reading this and eligible to vote in Canada consider it. Either vote or don't vote, but do so actively... if your voice will not be heard at the polls, find other ways to make it heard so that those who are awarded the power to develop and implement policies through our "democratic" political system know that we are not simply apathetic. Workers' groups and unions seem to be really trying to support the NDP, who I don't think that they will change much even if they did win, but the idea of a Conservative majority government scares me.

Transphobia on the radio

Dear Q92 Sudbury Radio Station,

I was listening to your morning show and was appalled by the overt discrimination in this morning's joke. I like to laugh at a good joke as much as the next person, but the level of sexism in many of your jokes is alarming. Today's joke, however, took it to a whole new level.

The punchline of the joke was that the woman, who had just kissed a man (that I would say was sexually harassing her), was actually born in a man's body. It was supposed to be funny because the man in the joke had just been kissed by a person many would deem male without knowing it. This joke is based on transphobia and homophobia. Instead of making life easier for transgendered people, this joke serves to uphold the dominant beliefs that they are unnatural. It spreads fear and hatred. It should never have made it on the air.

Jokes that are racist (at least overtly so) are not allowed to be told on your radio show, which is great. But why don't other groups, such as women and queer people, get the same level of respect.

I urge you to check the jokes more carefully before they are told on the air. I also think that it is important to issue an apology for the joke that was told this morning. Until then, I will not be tuning in to your station (or any other Rogers television and radio stations).

News; turning the election into a pop culture issue

Canada AM this morning ran a quick story this morning about the budget. They said that there was a possibility of a spring election if the Conservatives don't get enough support on this budget from the other parties. The consequences of this: Harper might be too busy with his campaign to go to the royal wedding, of course! The Horror!

I was in the UK last week and there was an upcoming election in Ireland. Election issues were being discussed at length... important ones... none of this but-how-will-an-election-affect-his-ability-to-go-to-a-fucking-WEDDING!